This single-paragraph order dismissed a writ petition challenging an enquiry notice because the petitioner had already attended the enquiry on the date specified, leaving nothing for adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.02.2015 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Writ Petition (MD) No.1383 of 2015
P.Kanagu ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Capuchin Friars Minor Society
represented by its Superior,
office at Anugraha Nochiodaipatti, Koovanuthu village, Dindigul Taluk and District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings in Na.Ka.6789/2014/Aa4/ dated 05.12.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karuna
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.
2.This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings dated 05.12.2014 issued by the first respondent.
3.Perusal of the said proceedings would show that the petitioner was only called upon to attend the enquiry which came to be held on 02.01.2015.
4.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the said proceedings, the petitioner has also attended the enquiry on 02.01.2015.
5.That being the factual position, I failed to understand as to how the petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the impugned proceedings which is only calling upon him to appear for enquiry https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on 02.01.2015.
2
6.Considering the fact that the petitioner has also appeared on 02.01.2015, I find that nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AS) /True copy/
sub Assistant Registrar
sms To
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
+1cc to MR.V.KARUNA,ADVOCATE IN SR NO. 5518
+1cc to Special Government Pleader Sr NO. 5454
Writ Petition (MD) No.1383 of 2015 05.02.2015
RG.23.02.2015 2P.4C.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a mere notice to attend an enquiry survives when the petitioner has already appeared.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Kanagu
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Capuchin Friars Minor Society
Justice K.Ravichandran Baba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court