R.Vijayalakshmi, v. the President
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking Earned Leave Salary was dismissed because the petitioner filed a memo requesting withdrawal of the petition on 30.6.2015.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 14.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
W.P.No.8508 OF 2014
R.VIJAYALAKSHMI [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 THE PRESIDENT
S-573 KOOTHAMPOONDI PRIMARY
AGRICULTRUAL CO- OPERATIVE SOCIETY
THIRUCHENGODE,
NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.
2 THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF
DEPUTY REGISTRAR BUILDING
THIRUCHENGODE POST, NAMAKKAL,
NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.
3 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR BUILDING
THIRUCHENGODE POST, NAMAKKAL,
NAMAKKAL DISTRICT. [ RESPONDENTS ]
Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondents to consider the representation given by the Petitioner dated 13.11.2013 for granting his Earned Leave Salary of Rs.53 984/for remaining 240 days in the light of GO (2D) No.15 Food and Consumer Protection Department dated 17.2.1995.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinor For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram Special Govt. Pleader O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition, as per the memo filed by the petitioner dated 30.6.2015. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Vijayalakshmi
- respondent
The President, S-573 Koothampondi Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society
- respondent
The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society
- respondent
The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Society
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court