Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

R.S.Bharathy Vs Secy.to the Govt.of T.N — Property and Title | Madras HC (2015)

Home
Madras HC
2015
R.S.Bharathy Vs Secy.to the Govt.of T.NR.S.Bharathy v. Secy.to the Govt.of T.N

Dismissed

R.S.Bharathy v. Secy.to the Govt.of T.N

Madras HC4 Mar 2015WP/472/1993

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition challenging sale of government land to respondent corporation. Court disposed petition as infructuous because property was re-conveyed.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated: 04.03.2015

CORAM:

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and

The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH

Writ Petition No. 472 of 1993

R. S. Bharathy ... Petitioner
vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
represented by Secretary
Industries Department
Madras – 9.
2. The Chairman & Managing Director
Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation Ltd.
Madras-14.
3. Selvi J. Jayalalitha
Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu
36, Poes Garden, Madras.

M/s. Jaya Publications rep. by its Partner Mrs.N.Sasikala C8-Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate Guindy, Madras-32. .. Cause title of R4 amended as per order dt.28.9.93 in WMP.No.27865/93.

The Sub Registrar Registrar Office Adyar, Madras. ... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration to declare the sale deed dated 29.5.1992 executed by the second respondent in favour of the fourth respondent as invalid and inoperative.Prayer amended as per order of court dated 28/9/93 in WMP.24038/93

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
R. S. Bharathy
respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu
respondent
The Chairman & Managing Director Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation Ltd.
respondent
Selvi J. Jayalalitha
respondent
M/s. Jaya Publications
respondent

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 4 Mar 2015 · March
Registered: 6 Jan 1993
Case no.: WP/472/1993

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M.m.sundresh

Abdul Kareem Vs R. Chitralekha
3 Mar 2015
Change India Vs Government of Tamilnadu
3 Mar 2015
R.Chitraleka Vs Kavitha Ramu
3 Mar 2015
Attavanai Ina Makkal Vs Chief Secretary to Government
4 Mar 2015

Cite this judgement

R.S.Bharathy v. Secy.to the Govt.of T.N, WP/472/1993 (MAD), decided on 4 March 2015.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Petition disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

A writ petition seeking declaration that a sale deed executed by the Second Respondent in favour of the Fourth Respondent was invalid was disposed of as infructuous. Learned counsel for the First and Second Respondents stated that the property in question stands re-conveyed, rendering the prayer baseless.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Petitioner : No Appearance

For Respondents : Mr. A.L. Somayaji, Advocate General assisted by Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader Assisted by Mr.I.S.Inbadurai, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr. L.P. Shanmughasundaram for R3&4 Mr. G. Muniratnam for R2

O R D E R (Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)

Initially the prayer made in this petition was to declare the action of the first three respondents in conveying the land and building of TANSI Foundry, Guindy, Madras owned by the Government for TANSI, as illegal, but subsequently it was amended to declare the sale deed dated 24.05.1992 executed by second respondent in favour of the fourth respondent as invalid and inoperative.

Learned Advocate General appearing for the first and second respondents states that the property in question stands re-conveyed and thus, the petition has become infructuous. 3. The aforesaid statement is taken on record and the petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ATR Copies to; 1. The Secretary State of Tamil Nadu Industries Department Madras – 9.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Chairman & Managing Director Tamil Nadu Small Industries Corporation Ltd. Madras-14.

The Sub Registrar Registrar Office Adyar, Madras.

+1cc to M/s.L.P.Shanmuga Sundaram, Advocate, S.R.No.12027
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.12162
+1cc to the Special Government Pleader, S.R.No.12151
W.P. No. 472 of 1993
CA(CO)
CA(19/03/2015)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Sub Registrar

Coram

AI extract

Sanjay Kishan Kaul
M.M. Sundresh

CNR

HCMA010102061993

Topic

Property and Title

Bench

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

The Official Liquidator Vs S. Malleswari

4 Mar 2015

P.Selvarajan Vs The Commissioner

4 Mar 2015