Disposed

P.Selvarajan v. The Commissioner

Madras HC4 Mar 2015WP/2121/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the High Court directed the first respondent to take necessary action to remove encroachment on municipality land and road after issuing notice, disposing of the petition with the direction to take action within one month.

What did the court decide?

First respondent directed to take action and remove encroachment within one month after giving notice to all concerned.

P.Selvarajan Vs The Commissioner — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.03.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶6

W.P.No.2121 of 2015

¶7

P.Selvarajan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Commissioner,
Attur Municipality,
Attur, Salem District.
2. Assistant Divisional Engineer (H),
Highways (C & M), Attur,
Salem District.
3. Malarkodi Rajendran
4. Ramasamy
5. Usha
6. Perumal
7. Poomani
8. Nallammal
9. Kannan
10.Periyasamy ... Respondents

¶8

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 18.09.2014 and to remove the encroachment made on the road leading to the Attur Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Bus Stand from the Salem Ulundurpet Highways Road.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Moorthy, Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 2 : Mr.E.Kannadasan for R-5

¶10

: No appearance for RR 3, 4 & 6 to 10

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶14

Learned Government Pleader states that on examination of the matter, it is found that the alleged encroachment is on the land of the Municipality / the first respondent and it is that respondent who has to take action.

¶15

2.Learned counsel for the fifth respondent has entered appearance.

¶16

3.In view of the aforesaid, it is for the first respondent now to take action in accordance with law, if encroachments are found, after notice to all concerned and the needful be done within one month from today.

¶17

4.Writ Petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
sra Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner,
Attur Municipality,
Attur, Salem District.
2. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (H),
Highways (C & M), Attur,
Salem District.
+1cc to M/s.S.Doraisamy, Advocate, S.R.No.12110
+1cc to M/s.E.Kannadasan, Advocate, S.R.No.12049
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.11992
W.P.No.2121 of 2015
MP(CO)
CA(17/03/2015)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Selvarajan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Selvarajan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Kareem Vs R. Chitralekha

Change India Vs Government of Tamilnadu

R.Chitraleka Vs Kavitha Ramu

R.S.Bharathy Vs Secy.to the Govt.of T.N

Attavanai Ina Makkal Vs Chief Secretary to Government

The Official Liquidator Vs S. Malleswari