Dismissed

M/S. Selva Ganapathy Rice v. the Chairman

Madras HC23 Apr 2015WP/42554/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an award by the Chennai Lok Adalat under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, disposing of Writ Petition No. 42554 of 2006. The court recorded a joint memo stating the petitioner paid Rs. 26,17,000 and documents were returned. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as nothing survives, and the petition for mandamus was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of with nothing surviving; no amount is due from the petitioner; the petitioner and respondents appear to have agreed to the terms of settlement.

M/S. Selva Ganapathy Rice Vs the Chairman — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶2

Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee

¶3

Thursday, the 23^th day of April 2015

¶4

LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶5

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P.THANGAVEL (Retd.) and

¶7

Members

¶8

Mr.S.Manoharan, District Judge, (Retd) Mrs.V.Nalini

¶9

W.P.No.42554 of 2006

¶10

(This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ or in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2006

¶11

M/s Selva Ganapathy Rice Mill, Rep by its Managing Partner, S.Kolandaisamy, .. Petitioner

¶12

¶13

1.The Chairman, State Bank of India, World Trade Centre, Sahaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai – 400 023.

¶14

2.The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, No.16, College Lane, Chennai – 600 006.

¶15

3.The Deputy General Manager, Region – II State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Coimbatore – 18.

¶16

4.The Assistant General Manager, Regional – II State Bank of India, Coimbatore. .. Respondents

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.P.D.Audikesavalu, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 is present.

¶19

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶20

The writ petition in W.P.No.42554 of 2006 pending on the file of the High Court, Madras has been referred to the Lok Adalat for conciliation today.

¶21

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus or direction in the nature of a writ, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 13.09.2006 and pass such further or other orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶22

The petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4 filed a joint memo to the effect that the representation of the petitioner has been considered by the respondents and a sum of Rs.26,17,000/was received by the respondents from the petitioner on 16.11.2007. It is also stated in the memo that the respondent has also closed the accounts of the petitioner on receipt of the above said amount and documents received for creating equitable mortgage has also been returned by the authority concerned to the petitioner on 09.11.2009. The said Joint Memo has been recorded by the Lok Adalat.

¶23

In view of the compromise arrived at between both parties before the Lok Adalat and in view of the recording to the above said Memo containing the details of payment by the petitioner to the respondents, it is ordered that there is no amount due to the respondents from the petitioner. Award is passed to the effect that nothing survive in this writ petition. Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. The aforesaid memo shall form part of the award. No order as to costs. Signature of the counsel for petitioner is not necessary since the said counsel has already signed along with petitioner in the Memo filed and recorded.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

The Chairman, State Bank of India, World Trade Centre, Sahaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai – 400 023.

¶26

The General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, No.16, College Lane, Chennai – 600 006.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

The Deputy General Manager, Region – II State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Coimbatore – 18.

¶29

The Assistant General Manager, Regional – II State Bank of India, Coimbatore. Sd/-

¶30

Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4

¶31

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶32

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the petitioner
in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu
Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act,
1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA
Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
*The Xerox Copy of Memo is enclosed
herewith.
Sd/-
Judge
Sd/- Sd/-
Member Member
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to
1. The Chairman,
State Bank of India,
World Trade Centre,
Sahaheed Bhagat Singh Road,
Mumbai – 400 023.

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶34

The General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Local Head Office, No.16, College Lane,
Chennai – 600 006.
3. The Deputy General Manager,
Region – II State Bank of India,
Zone Office, Coimbatore – 18.
4. The Assistant General Manager,
Regional – II State Bank of India,
Coimbatore.
5. The Secretary,
High Court Legal Services Committee,
Chennai.
6. The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
High Court,
Madras.
7. The Section Officer,
Lok Adalat Section,
High Court,
Madras.+2 copies.
W.P.No.42554 of 2006
ug(CO)
srg(20/05/2016)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Selva Ganapathy Rice v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Selva Ganapathy Rice v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Branch Manger Vs Mrs.Jaya Lakshmi

The Managing Director- Vs Kaliyamurthy

Managing Director Vs Mutthal

S.Rajendran, Vs the Secretary to Government

J.Suresh, Vs the District Elementary

R.Kaliammal Vs Manohar