R.Kaliammal v. Manohar
Case brief
What is this about?
Lok Adalat settled a specific performance suit dispute where the plaintiff deposits a lump sum and transfers documents, and defendants pay a larger sum to become absolute owners of the suit property with a charge until payment.
What did the court decide?
Respondents to pay Rs.3,00,000/- to appellants within two months; appellants to hand over patta documents and withdraw deposited funds upon payment; charge on property until full payment.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI
Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Thursday, the 02nd day of July, 2015
LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P. THANGAVEL (Retd.) and
Members
Mr.E. Krishnan Mrs.V.J.Latha
S.A.No.43 of 2014
(This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.07.2013 in A.S.No.10 of 2011 on the file of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2008 in O.S.No.6 of 2005 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Thiruvarur)
1.R.Kaliammal 2.S.Anjammal 3.Muthulakshmi .. Appellants
Vs.
1.Manohar Rajamani(died) 2.Sekar @ Sakthimaindan 3.Kumar @ Sivakumar .. Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
How can a dispute regarding specific performance of a contract for sale of immoveable property be amicably settled?
What are the terms of the settlement arrived between the parties?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Kaliammal
- appellant
S.Anjammal
- appellant
Muthulakshmi
- respondent
Sekar @ Sakthimaindan
- respondent
Kumar @ Sivakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court