Lok Adalat settled a writ petition challenging suspension period treatment and subsistence allowance. Parties compromised, leading to a decree based on joint endorsement. Court fees were refundable and connected petitions closed.
Award passed in terms of joint endorsement of parties; court fees refunded; connected petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI
Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee
Wednesday, the 01st day of July, 2015
LOK ADALAT ORDER
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE P.THANGAVEL (Retd.)
and
Members
Mr.S.S.Mariappan
Mr.S.R.Sundaram
W.P.No.22711 of 2012
(Writ Petition has filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records and quash the said orders of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.449/A3/09 dated 12.05.2010 to treating the petitioner's period of suspension from 28.01.2009 and 06.11.2009 as eligible leave period and second respondent in Na.Ka.A1/101/2009 dated 03.06.2010 to deposit to the government subsistence allowance for a period of 74 days after calculating the eligible leave period)
J.Suresh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Elementary Education Officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
2.The Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Kanai Panchayat Union, Kanai, Villupuram District. ... Respondents
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.C.Mathan Raj and Mr.Jayasankar for respondents 1 and 2 as party-in-person are present.
O R D E R
The Petition in W.P.No.22711 of 2012 pending on the file of High Court, Madras is referred to Lok Adalat for conciliation today.
the eligible leave period.
Sd/sd/J.Suresh Counsel for the petitioner 1.The District Elementary Education Officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 2.The Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Kanai Panchayat Union, Kanai, Villupuram District. ...Party-in-person The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the petitioners in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994. sd/JUDGE sd/sd/MEMBER MEMBER Sd/Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar
To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:
1.The District Elementary Education Officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
br(co)
krd 14/7
W.P.No.22711 of 2012
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a compromise regarding a writ petition concerning grievance about suspension period and subsistence allowance can be recorded by Lok Adalat.
Whether court fees paid for the writ petition can be refunded upon compromise recorded under the Legal Services Authorities Act.
Whether connected miscellaneous petitions can be closed in view of the compromise.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
J.Suresh
The District Elementary Education Officer, Villupuram District
The Assistant Elementary Education Officer, Kanai Panchayat Union
P.THANGAVEL
S.S.MARIAPPAN
S.R.SUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
