Disposed

A.K.Venkata Subramanian v. the State Election Commissione

Madras HC25 Feb 2015WP/4041/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras closed Writ Petition No. 4041 of 2007 and M.P. No. 1 of 2007. Counsel informed the court that the petitioner was deceased but the remedy sought had already been provided, rendering the petition superfluous. Accordingly, the petition and the miscellaneous petition were closed without costs.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and miscellaneous petition were closed without costs.

A.K.Venkata Subramanian Vs the State Election… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated: 25.02.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and

¶5

The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH

¶6

Writ Petition No. 4041 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007

¶7

A. K. Venkatasubramanian ... Petitioner

¶8

vs.
1. The State Election Commissioner
State Election Commission
58, Revathi Street
Inner Ring Road, Vadapalani
Chennai 600 024.

¶9

The Chief Election Commissioner Election Commission of India Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road New Delhi 110 001. 3. The Government of Tamilnadu rep. by Secretary Municipal Administration Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶10

Corporation of Chennai rep. by its Commissioner Ripon Building Chennai 600 003. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to directing the 1^st respondent to deploy and use electronic voting machines for elections in all Municipal Corporations in the State of Tamil Nadu in accordance with Rules 58 to 80 of the Tamilnadu Town Panchayats, Third Grade Municipalities, Municipalities and Corporations (Elections) Rules 2006.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. N.L. Rajah

¶14

For Respondents : Mr. K. Elango for R1 Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader for R3 Mr. Niranjan Rajagopal for R2 Mr. K. Soundararajan for R4

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is
no more, but however the relief sought for has worked itself out, as
the necessary remedy has been provided.
2. The writ petition accordingly stands closed. No costs.
Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2007 is closed.
Sd/-
Asst. Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar.
ATR
Copies to;
1. The State Election Commissioner
State Election Commission
58, Revathi Street
Inner Ring Road, Vadapalani
Chennai 600 024.
2. The Chief Election Commissioner
Election Commission of India
Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road
New Delhi 110 001.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The Secretary

¶19

Government of Tamilnadu

¶20

Municipal Administration

¶21

Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶22

The Commissioner

¶23

Corporation of Chennai

¶24

Ripon Building

¶25

Chennai 600 003.

¶26

+1cc to Mr.K.Soundararajan, Advocate, S.R.No.10391
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.10345

¶27

W.P. No. 4041 of 2007
UG(CO)
CA(06/03/2015)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.K.Venkata Subramanian v. the State Election Commissione

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.K.Venkata Subramanian v. the State Election Commissione

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vs

B.Nesamony Vs Prabhahara Rao IAS

M.Rajagopal Vs Dr.T.Prabhakara Rao IAS

Vs

Mr.Ahmathulla Vs T.N. State Human Rights

S. Sathia Chandran Vs the Registrar