Mr.Ahmathulla v. T.N. State Human Rights
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition sought quashing of an enquiry and a fresh investigation. With the acquittal of the police officials in the underlying criminal case, the court dismissed the petition as no substantial question remained. The writ petition stands closed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition stands closed. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 25.02.2015
CORAM:
The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and
The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH
Writ Petition No. 16834 of 2012
Ahmathulla ... Petitioner
vs.
1. T.N. State Human Rights Commission
143, Kumarasamy Raja Salai
Greenways Road, Chennai – 28.
2. Mr. Koteeswaran
Inspector of Police
Kattumannarkoil Police Station
Kattumannarkoil, Cuddalore District.
- Mr. Senthil Vinayagam
Sub Inspector of Police
Kattumannarkoil Police Station
Kattumannarkoil, Cuddalore District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition No.3245/2007 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in SHRC 692 of 2010 dated 28.4.2011, quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to conduct fresh full-fledged enquiry on the petitioner's complaint after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties and take a decision on merit.
For Petitioner : Mr. A. Sirajudin for M/s. Siraj & Siraj For Respondents : Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr. S. Saravanakumar for R2 & R3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ahmathulla
- respondent
T.N. State Human Rights Commission
- respondent
Koteeswaran
- respondent
Senthil Vinayagam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court