Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The Division Bench allowed a writ appeal holding the petitioner's relaxation policy for promotion violative of Article 14. In this review, the petitioner argued lack of opportunity to defend the policy. The court found both sides heard earlier, rejected the petition for rehearing, and dismissed the application.
What did the court decide?
The Review Application stands dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.02.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
Review Application No.68 of 2004 in W.A.No.731 of 1999
1.The Oil & Natural Gas Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, Dehradun, U.P.State.
2.The Regional Director, Southern Region, Business Centre, Oil & Natural Gas Commission, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.
3.The General Manager (P& A), Southern Region Business Centre, ONGC., Chennai-8.
..Petitioners
Versus
Arul Anand A-G-3, Guru Raghavendra Apartments, I Main Road, Thillai Ganga Nagar, Chennai-600 061. ..Respondent
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Review Application warrants setting aside the earlier decision holding the petitioner's promotion policy violative of Article 14?
Whether non-simultaneous issuance of appointment orders negates the opportunity of hearing given to the petitioners earlier?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Oil & Natural Gas Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, Regional Director, General Manager (P& A)
- respondent
Arul Anand
Coram
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court