Disposed

A.C.Muthukanan v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC11 Dec 2015WP/38947/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to Government authorities for traffic arrangements during school opening/closing. The Court held that the petitioner must first submit a representation to the local police, expected to be disposed of within one month.

What did the court decide?

Directions were issued to the petitioner to file a representation to the local police authority for proper parking arrangements.

A.C.Muthukanan Vs The Government of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.12.2015

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶7

W.P. No.38947 of 2015
A.C.Muthukanan .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai.
2.The Director,
Central Board of Secondary Education
(CBSE), New Delhi.
3.The Regional Manager,
Central Board of Secondary Education
(CBSE), No.1630 A, 15 th Main Road,
Anna Nagar West, Chennai.40
4.The Director of Secondary Education,
DPI Complex, College Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai.6
5.The Principal,
Chinmaya Vidyalaya,
No.5063, Belly Area,
Chennai.40
6.The Managing Trustee
Chennai Chinmaya Mission Trust,
13 th Avenue, Harington Road,
Chennai.31 .. Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 to 4

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

to take appropriate action against 5^th and 6^th respondents based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.09.2015.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vaithiyalingam For Respondents : Mr.S.T.S.Murthi, Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 4

¶12

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶13

In the given facts of the case, the only thing which is required to be done is to have proper traffic arrangements at the time of school opening and dispersal of the school. However, we find both from the array of parties and the representation of the petitioner that nothing has been addressed to the local police authorities.

¶14

2.We are, thus, of the view that the petitioner must first approach the police authority through a representation and that authority, in turn, would then deal with the representation as to how proper parking arrangements can be made around the school. On such representation being made to the competent authority, we expect it to be disposed of within one (1) month of the receipt of the representation.

¶15

3.Writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs.

¶16

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS V ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar sra To 1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.

¶17

2.The Director, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), New Delhi.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

3.The Regional Manager, Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), No.1630 A, 15^th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai.40

¶20

4.The Director of Secondary Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai.6

¶21

1 cc to M/s. V. Vaithilingam, Advocate, Sr. 66561

¶22

1 cc to Government Pleader, Sr. 66667

¶23

W.P.No.38947 of 2015
AK (CO)
kk 23/12

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.C.Muthukanan v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.C.Muthukanan v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt.B.Thiraviam Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Tmt. B.Nthiraviam Vs State of Tamilnadu

Bhaskar Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs Global Software Limited

S. Nagarajan Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

G.Devarajan Vs The chief Secretary

Freedom Concept School, Vs Union of India