S. Padma v. the State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that nothing survived in the case.
What did the court decide?
None granted as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.03.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.No.24288 of 2006
1.S.Padma 2.V.Brindaa Lakshmi 3.M.Kaladevi 4.R.Rukshali 5.M.Ambika 6.K.Sheela Kumari 7.M.Swetha 8.J.Jayalakshmi 9.D.Priyadharshini 10.Manoj Prabhakar 11.D.Sharmila 12.S.Barani Kumari 13.K.Sruthi 14.L.J.Sai Lakshmi 15.K.Rekha 16.Abishek Johnson Babu ... Petitioners -vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Govt., Health & Family Welfare Dept., Fort St. George, Chennai. 2. The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai. 3. The Registrar, Dr.M.G.R. University, Guindy, Chennai. 4. Meenakshi Ammal Dental College Rep. by its Management Trustee, New No.61, Ramasamy Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai. ... Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 4th respondent not to collect or demand any fees more than that fixed by the Permanent Committee by its proceedings No.SFPC/PC dated 13.08.2004 and forbear the 4th respondent from disturbing the students in any manner for nonpayment of fees as prescribed by the management.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Padma and Others
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Director of Medical Education
- respondent
Registrar, Dr.M.G.R. University
- respondent
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court