Rs.10 lakhs, out of which Rs.5 lakhs to be paid before 30.4.2014 and another Rs.5 lakhs on or before 31.5.2014, with a further direction to pay Rs.50,000/- continuously per month till the disposal of the writ petition, failing which the interim order shall stand automatically vacated, has given a chance to the petitioner to pay the monthly rent. But the petitioner sangam has not even made use of the opportunity. Although the petitioner sangam had paid Rs.5 lakhs on 28.4.2014, without paying another Rs.5 lakhs, though sought for time for payment, once again this Court by order dated 30.5.2014 granted four more weeks to clear the second instalment of Rs.5 lakhs. Ironically the petitioner till date has not even come forward to pay Rs.50,000/- every month as directed by this Court, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to maintain the writ petitions, as he has not complied with the conditional order in full. Moreover, when the petitioner sangam is liable to pay Rs.84,90,786/- which is the rental arrears for 16 long years along with interest and the interim order passed by this Court also has not been complied with, it is not open to the petitioner to maintain the writ petitions. Concluding his arguments, the learned Additional Advocate General submitted that as on 27.5.2015, the petitioner has to pay Rs.93,83,064/-. Without paying the said outstanding, the petitioner cannot maintain the writ petitions. In view of the non payment of a huge amount, the respondents are put to grave prejudice of financial loss and also not able to let out the same to other parties who are prepared to pay the monthly rent.
