The petitioner filed a contempt petition to punish the respondent for disobeying an order. The court noted that the learned counsel stated the order was duly complied with and closed the petition.
None granted as the petition was closed upon submission of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.1545 of 2015
M/s.Jindal Steels
Rep: by its Proprietrix
Smt.Meenal Kumari Surana ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Nagaraj
The Assistant Commissioner (CT)
Hosur North ... Respondent
Prayer :
Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt
of Courts Act, praying to initiate contempt proceedings
against the respondent and punish the respondent for
willfully disobeying the order dated 12.06.2015 passed in
W.P.No.16629 of 2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Adithya Reddy
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed to punish the respondent for having disobeying the order passed in W.P.No. 16629 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015.
2
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submitted that the order passed in W.P.No. 16629 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015 has been duly complied with. Recording the said statement, this contempt petition is closed.
pri
SD/-
DEPUTY REGISTRAR(OS)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2015.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
KMV/ASO/14/12/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the order dated 12.06.2015 passed in W.P.No.16629 of 2015.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Jindal Steels
Mr. Nagaraj
T.RAja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
