K.Loganathan v. Ambikapathy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal under Section 47 of the Guardian and Wards Act as infructuous because the matter had been settled before the lower court.
What did the court decide?
The civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.11.2015
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
C.M.A.No.557 of 2012
K.Loganathan ..Appellant
-Vs-
Ambikapathy
W/o Loganathan ..Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 47 of the
Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 against the fair and final order of the
learned Principal District Judge, Erode in G.W.O.P.No.2 of 2010 dated
6.7.2011.
For Appellant : Mr.A.K.Kumaraswamy
For Respondent : Mr.T.Murugamanickam
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the matter has
been settled before the lower Court. Recording his statement, the
civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Ss
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-V)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
The Principal District Judge, Erode
+1 C.C. To MR.A.K.Kumarasamy, Advocate in SR.NO.62882
C.M.A.No.557 of 2012
SV(CO) sd : 15/12/2015
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Loganathan
- respondent
Ambikapathy
Coram
T. Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court