Allowed

Sathish Kumar, v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/16084/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused of dowry harassment and cruelty offences under the IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, subject to conditions including execution of a bond and daily reporting.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail in event of arrest upon executing bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each; must appear daily before police until further orders.

Sathish Kumar, Vs Inspector of Police — Dowry and Cruelty | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.16084 of 2015

¶6

1 SATHISH KUMAR 2 THAVASIRAJAN 3 SELVI 4 RAMUTHAI ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4

¶7

STATE THROUGH

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.24 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.S.MUNIYANDI Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.24 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant, who is the physically challenged person, was harassed by the accused demanding additional dowry.

¶15

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and it is further submitted that the first petitioner has filed H.M.O.P.No.202 of 2015 before the Sub-Court, Thirumangalam against the de-facto complainant for restitution of conjugal rights.

¶16

4.It is further submitted that the de-facto complainant and her husband appeared before the Mediation and in the Mediation the husband was ready for reunion, but she was not interested, hence, the Mediation failed.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

¶18

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders and the petitioners No.2 to 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/-

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶25

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶26

3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT,

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.S.MUNIYANDI Advocate SR.No.60313

¶29

NS/SKS-RR/SAR I/14.10.2015 :2P/6C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sathish Kumar, v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathish Kumar, v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arokiasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Natarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kamaraj Vs the Insepector of Police

Ashok Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Abdul Samad, Vs the Inspector of Police

Baskaran, Vs the Inspector of Police