Allowed

Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/13103/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons facing charges under IPC sections 498(A) and 506, and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court ordered their release upon execution of bonds and specified conditions, including appearing before the Magistrate within 15 days, failing which the bail stands dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on anticipatory bail conditioned on execution of bond with sureties and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Ashok Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.13103 of 2015

¶6

1 ASHOK KUMAR 2 KANMANI 3 SASIKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.1 to 3

¶7

Vs THE STATE REP.BY

¶8

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, IN CR. NO.20 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.D.ANBARASU Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 506 (2) IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.20 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.It is alleged that the petitioners have harassed the defacto complainant and demanded dowry.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the defacto complainant is not willing for re-union and she refused to live with the first petitioner.

¶16

The Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioners have demanded Rs.5 ½ lakhs and 5 cents of land.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Kanyakumari, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police at 10.00 a.m until further orders and the petitioners

¶18

2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶19

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

12/10/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,KANYAKUMARI

¶25

2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT,

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.D.ANBARASU Advocate SR.No.60349.

¶29

AM/15.10.2015/AMF/SAR-I/2P/6C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arokiasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Natarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kamaraj Vs the Insepector of Police

N.Abdul Samad, Vs the Inspector of Police

Baskaran, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathish Kumar, Vs Inspector of Police