Disposed

Baskaran, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/15040/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. alleging false implication in a criminal case involving alleged property fraud and various offenses. The Court inclined to grant bail subject to specific conditions including execution of a bond, appearance requirements, and compliance with statutory provisions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on conditions including bond execution, appearance before police and magistrate, and compliance with Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Baskaran, Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twelfth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.15040 of 2015

1 BASKARAN,

2 KAYALVIZHI

3 MAYANDI

4 SEVANTHY

¶10

5 MURUGAN,

¶11

6 SIVAKAMI,

¶12

7 PRAVEENKUMAR, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 7

¶13

Vs THE STATE REP BY

¶14

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.214/14) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶15

For Petitioner : M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate

¶16

For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶17

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶18

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A7, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 341, 420 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.214 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶20

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is the father of the first petitioner. On 16.05.2014 the first petitioner has fraudulently converted his father's property into his name and the other petitioners helped to the first petitioner.

¶21

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶22

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

¶23

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶24

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakkottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders and the petitioners No.2 to 7 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶25

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

12/10/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶30

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶31

Madurai - 625 023.

¶32

¶33

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NILAKKOTTAI

¶34

DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL DISTRICT

¶35

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,BATLAGUNDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶36

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶37

+1. CC to M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.60592

¶38

ORDER

¶39

¶40

CRL OP(MD) No.15040 of 2015

¶41

Date :12/10/2015

¶42

GJM/JGB/SARII-14.10.15-2P-6c

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Baskaran, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baskaran, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arokiasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Natarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kamaraj Vs the Insepector of Police

Ashok Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Abdul Samad, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sathish Kumar, Vs Inspector of Police