S.Saroja v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought police protection. Court directed second respondent to complete pending enquiry within two weeks and disposed of the petition.
Petitioner sought police protection. Court directed second respondent to complete pending enquiry within two weeks and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.07.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14251 of 2015
S.Saroja ... Petitioner
Vs.
3.Adaikkan ... Respondents
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on the compliant dated 21.07.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.George Paul Anto
For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl.side)
ORDER
Seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on the compliant dated 21.07.2015, the petitioner has come up with this petition.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions, would submit that the enquiry is pending.
2
4.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AE)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
PJL
TE/PRV/SAR-I 14/08/2015 : 2P/5C
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14251 of 2015
29.07.2015
S.Saroja
The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District
The Inspector of Police, Karaiyur Police Station
M.M. Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court