Disposed

Nagarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC29 Jul 2015CRL OP(MD)/14221/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC granted a direction to the respondent police officer to complete the pending enquiry within four weeks. The court also directed that the petitioner shall not be harassed during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to second respondent to complete the pending inquiry within four weeks and that the petitioner shall not be harassed.

Nagarajan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.07.2015

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14221 of 2015

¶7

Nagarajan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District.

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathy Police Station, Pudukottai District. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER:

¶12

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute of the petitioner under the guise of any investigation.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan

¶15

Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Seeking a direction to the second respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute of the petitioner under the guise of investigation, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶18

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions, would submit that the enquiry is pending and the petitioner is merely called for enquiry.

¶19

Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the meanwhile the petitioner shall not be harassed.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

¶22

4.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

/True Copy/

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

The Superintendent of Police,

¶29

Pudukottai District.

¶30

The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathy Police Station, Pudukottai District.

¶31

The Additional Public Prosecutor,

¶32

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶33

- 1 CC TO M/S.T.VADIVELAN, ADVOCATE SR NO. 42447/15

¶34

PJL

¶35

TE/PRV/SAR-I 14/08/2015 : 2P/5C

¶36

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14221 of 2015

¶37

29.07.2015

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nagarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagarajan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S. Abubakar, 60/M Vs the Additional Director

N.Muthu Vs the Commissioner of Police

A. Selvaraj Vs the Superintendent of Police

Kulandhai Arul Samy Vs M.Janet Reksilin

S.Krishnan Pillai, Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

S.Saroja Vs the Superintendent of Police