Disposed

D.Shantha v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC2 Jul 2015CRL OP/16295/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner directed to comply personally with police by submitting a complaint dated 16.6.2015. Upon receipt, police must register the complaint, conduct inquiry, and act in accordance with Lalita Kumari guidelines.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to comply and give a copy of the complaint in person to the respondent police for registration and further action.

D.Shantha Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

CRL.O.P.No. 16295 of 2015.

D.Shantha

Petitioner.

Vs.

State by Inspector of Police, Pallikaranai Police Station, Pallikaranai,

¶10

Chennai - 600 100

¶11

... Respondents.

¶12

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to issue a direction to the respondent, the Inspector of Police, Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai- 600 100, to register the complaint dated 16.6.2015 given by the petitioner and to take actin against the person mentioned in the complaint and also to file a report within a specified time.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Murugeswari

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶15

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to issue direction to the respondent to register a complaint dated 16.6.2015 given by the petitioner and to take action and file a final report within a specified time.

¶16

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

¶17

It is represented that the petitioner has sent a complaint dated 16.6.2015 to the respondent police by post and no action has been taken. The Petitioner is directed to go in person and ;give a copy of the complaint to the respondent police and on such complaint being vien, the same shall be enquired into and action shall be taken in accordance with law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh andothers in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶20

ds
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
Pallikaranai Police Station,
Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100.
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to M/s.Murugeswari, Advocate SR 33257
mg(co)
prk24/7 Crl.O.P.No. 16295 of 2015.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Shantha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Shantha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.v.Sakthi Vs the Superintendent of Police

C.Jeevarani Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Prabhakaran Vs the Commissioner of Police

V.Ganesan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Mohanraj Vs State Rep. by

Muniyappan Vs the Inspector of Police