D.Andrina v. George
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience of an order. The present order dismissed the petition as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.04.2015
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI
Contempt Petition No.434 of 2015
D.Andrina. .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.George,
The Commissioner of Police,
Vepery, Chennai-7.
2.Mr.Kannan
The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Adyar, Chennai. ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Court Act 1971 to punish the respondents for contempt for
wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated
12.08.2014 in Crl.Op.No.21253 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.Shanmugasundaram, Public Prosecutor.
2
O R D E R
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner, this contempt petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
tsh
SD/
DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2015.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
SS/CO/06/05/2015
One CC to Public Prosecutor, SR.5358
To
1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
2.The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-7.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Adyar, Chennai.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Andrina
- respondent
Mr.George
- respondent
Mr.Kannan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court