grabbing the entire property. That is why, the FIR is registered for the ofences under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 r/w.120B IPC. The learned counsel for the petitioners would first of all argue that there is no act of forgery in executing the documents as above referred to and in the absence of any act of forgery, no ingredients for other IPC offences as above referred to are made out in the present case. The learned counsel for the petitioners has at this juncture drawn the attention of this court to Sections 463 and 464 IPC, which define the act of forgery and making a false document. The act of forgery as defined under Section 463 is, whoever makes any false document with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud, under section 464, there are three modes to make a false document. Firstly, a person is said to make a false document, who dishonestly or fraudulently (a)makes, sign, seals, or execute a document or part of a document (b)......... (c)....... (d)........with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document was made, signed, sealed executed, transmitted or affixed by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed, executed or affixed. The second type of making a false document is who, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently by cancellation or otherwise, alters a document in any material part thereof, after it has been made, executed or affixed with either by himself or by any other person, whether such person be living or dead at the time of such alteration. The third mode of making a false document is who dishonestly or fraudulently causes any person to sign, seal, execute or alter a document, knowing that such person by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot, or that by reason of deception practised upon him, he does not know the contents of the document or the nature of the alteration. Section 465 is the penalty section for the act of forgery and Section 468 deals with the forgery for the purpose of cheating and section 471 is the punishment section for fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine the forged document. As rightly argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the present case, the allegations regarding the manner of execution of the documents do not attract the ingredients of making false documents under either of the three modes as explained above.
