Disposed

Chellammal v. Rajeswari Ammal

Madras HC1 Apr 2015SA/506/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Second Appeal was disposed of on a joint memo of compromise filed by the appellants and respondents. The Court recorded the compromise and passed a final decree for allotment of shares and recovery of amounts as per the terms of the compromise dated 01.04.2015.

What did the court decide?

Final decree passed for allotment of shares and recovery of amounts in terms of the joint memo of compromise.

Chellammal Vs Rajeswari Ammal — Property and Title | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 01.04.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI

¶5

S.A.No.506 of 2008 &

¶6

M.P.No.1 of 2008

¶7

Chellammal
2. K.Rajendran (Deceased)
3. K.Ravi
4. Lakshmi
5. Panneerselvam
6. K.Ramesh
7. shanthi
8. L.Usha
9. S.Nalini
10.R.Renuka
11.R.Murali ..Appellants/Appellants/Nil
(Appellants 7 to 11 brought on record as
LRs and 1st appellant recorded as LR of the
deceased 2nd appellant vide Order of Court
dated 10.12.2014 made in M.P.No.1/2014
in SA.No.506 of 2008)
Vs
1. Rajeswari Ammal
2. Krishnamoorthy
3. Gunasundari
4. Ekambaram
5. Devanathan .. Respondents/Respondents 2 to 6/
Plaintiffs.

¶8

PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1974 against the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2007 made in A.S.No.103 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.01.2004 made in O.S.No.234 of 1998 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu.

¶9

For Appellants : Mr.M.S..Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The appellants 1, 3 to 11 and the respondents 1 to 5 along with their respective counsel on record are present.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

A joint memo of compromise signed by the appellants 1, 3 to 11 and the respondents 1 to 5 and the learned counsel on record for the appellants and the respondents is filed before this Court. This Court personally enquired the parties about the compromise and the parties admitted the factum and the contents of the compromise and also expressed their willingness to have final decree in terms of compromise. The Joint Memo of Compromise is duly recorded.

¶14

In view of the Joint Memo of Compromise, final decree is passed for allotment of the shares and for recovery of the amount in terms of the compromise. In the event of execution of decree for recovery of amount, the necessary Court Fee may be collected in the Execution Proceedings.

¶15

The Second Appeal, is hence disposed of, in terms of joint memo of compromise filed by the parties and the Joint Memo of Compromise, dated 01.04.2015, shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. kal -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1. The Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu. 2. The Additional Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu. Copy to: The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, High Court, Madras (Records if any) + 2 ccs to Mr.M.S..Subramaniam, Advocate SR 18604 + 1 cc to Mr.T.Dhanyakumar, Advocate SR 18697 sr(co) prk25/5 S.A.No.506 of 2008 & M.P.No.1 of 2008

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chellammal v. Rajeswari Ammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chellammal v. Rajeswari Ammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Mariyappa Chetty Vs R.Elangovan

Kumar Vs Vadivelu

K. Munusamy Vs Theertheeswaraswamy

Arokianathan Vs Mrss.Parvathammal

J. Ravikrishna Vs M/ Sathya Nagar Welfare

Iysha Ummal 11 Kamarajar Vs Official Trustee of Tn.