Contempt petition filed alleging non-compliance of an order. Respondent corporation submitted the order was complied with. Court closed the petition with liberty to question the compliance order.
Contempt petition stands closed with liberty to question the compliance order if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.06.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN,J.
Cont.P.No.2208 of 2013
D.Gowri ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Vikram Kapur, I.A.S.,
Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings, Chennai.
2.K.Dharmalingam
The Deputy Director of Local Fund Audit,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings, Chennai. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act to punish the respondents herein for their wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in
W.P.No.27280 of 2009 dated 08.03.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jaganathan
For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed for the alleged non-
compliance of the order dated 08.03.2012 made in W.P.No.27280 of 2009.
submitted that this Court by an dated 08.03.2012 in W.P.No.27280
of 2009, directed the respondents to dispose of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
representation of the petitioner, dated 10.08.2009. The
2
Corporation passed an order dated 02.05.2012 in compliance of the order passed by this Court. The petitioner, instead of questioning the same has filed this contempt petition.
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be allowed given the respondent corporation claimed compliance with the earlier order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Gowri
Vikram Kapur
K.Dharmalingam
D.Hariparaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
