V.Parvathi v. Kannappan
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition challenging non-compliance of an order in W.P.No.22647 of 2013. The respondent Government Advocate submitted that compliance was achieved via an order dated 25.06.2015. The court accepted the submission and closed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.06.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN,J.
Cont.P.No.1178 of 2015
V.Parvathi ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Kannappan
Director of School Education,
College Road, Chennai -6.
2.Mr.Gopidoss
Chief Education Officer,
Namakkal District.
3.Mr.Gnanajothi
District Education Officer,
Namakkal District. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts
Act to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience in
implementing the order of this Court passed in M.P.No.2 of 2013
in W.P.No.22647 of 2013 dated 19.08.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran
For Respondents : Ms.P.Rajalakshmi
Govt.Advocate
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed for the alleged non-
compliance of the order dated 19.08.2013 made in M.P.No.2 of
2013 in W.P.No.22647 of 2013.
2
- The learned Government Advocate would submit that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents vide order dated 25.06.2015 in Na.Ka.No.5858/A3/2013.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition filed for non-compliance of the order in W.P.No.22647 of 2013 requires adjudication or can be closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parvathi
- respondent
Mr. Kannappan
- respondent
Mr. Gopidoss
- respondent
Mr. Gnanajothi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court