Disposed

A.R.Muthu Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnaldu rep.

Madras HC25 Jun 2015WP/17817/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction for regularisation of his service as Instructor (Computer). The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed first respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation of 20.4.2015 within 12 weeks.

A.R.Muthu Saravanan Vs The State of Tamilnaldu rep. — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.06.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

¶5

W.P.No.17817 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶6

A.R.Muthu Saravanan ...Petitioner
vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu
rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Tourism and Culture Department,
Secretariat, Chennai - 9.
2. The Commissioner of Art and Culture,
Emore, Chennai - 8.
3. The Principal,
Mamallapuram College of Architecture and
Sculpture, Mamallapuram,
Kancheepuram District. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd
respondents to consider the claims of the petitioner and pass
orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.4.2015 in
regard to regularisation of service in the post of Instructor
(Computer) in the light of the similarly placed persons order of
the High Court dated 16.8.2010 in W.P.No.19462 of 2009 and was
complied in G.O.(Ms) No.112, Tourism and Culture (Cul 1-1)
Department, dated 03.08.2011.
For petitioner : Mr.G.Elanchezhiyan
For respondents : Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam,
Additional Government Pleader

¶7

ORDER

¶8

Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

2. Head both sides.

¶11

3.The petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.4.2015 with regard to regularisation of service in the post of Instructor (Computer) in the light of the similarly placed persons' order of the High Court dated 16.8.2010 in W.P.No.19462 of 2009 and was complied in G.O. (Ms) No.112, Tourism and Culture (Cul 1-1) Department, dated 03.08.2011.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the representation of the petitioner dated 20.4.2015 for regularisation of his service is disposed of by the first respondent within a stipulated period, the petitioner will be satisfied.

¶13

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner joined the service along with one A.Parimala by a common appointment order dated 17.6.2005. The said Parimala was appointed as Instructor in Traditional Drawing and Painting and the petitioner was appointed in the Computer Section. The said Parimala was regularised pursuant to G.O.(Ms).No.112, Tourism and Culture (Cul 1-1) Department, dated 3.8.2011 based on the order of this Court dated 16.8.2010 in W.P.No.19462 of 2010. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of the petitioner's representation by the first respondent in the light of the aforesaid facts.

¶14

In view of the narrow prayer made, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.4.2015 in the light of the aforesaid facts within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. The connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/Assistant Registrar(AD-I)

¶16

//True Copy//

¶17

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶18

asvm

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

¶21

The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tourism and Culture Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9. 2. The Commissioner of Art and Culture, Emore, Chennai - 8. 3. The Principal, Mamallapuram College of Architecture and Sculpture, Mamallapuram, Kancheepuram District. 1 CC to the Government Pleader, SR.No. 31439 W.P.No.17817 of 2015

¶22

MG (CO) PSI (06.07.2015)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.R.Muthu Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnaldu rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.R.Muthu Saravanan v. The State of Tamilnaldu rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Devadoss Vs The Managing Director

S. Kapil Dev Vs the Commanding Officer

K.Govindhan Vs The State of Tamilnaduy

R.Muralitharan Vs the Central Registrar of Co. Op

Dr.E.Chandra Vs the State of Tamilnadu

K.Kausalya Vs the Commissioner of Municipal