The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. No costs were awarded.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.12.2014 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2014
Nagarajan
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry without following due process of law.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganandam Additional Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Per.Admn)
\True copy\
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1 CC TO THE SPL.GOVT.PLEADER SR.NO.64423
W.P(MD)No.19375 of 2014 01.12.2014
AKV NA/10/12/2014/P1/4C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagarajan
The District Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar
The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District
M. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
