A writ petition seeking a writ of Mandamus to consider a representation rejected by the second respondent. The court opined as nothing survived for adjudication and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.12.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL
W.P(MD)No.19025 of 2014
GANESAN .. Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mahendran
For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader, Sr.No.65309 rj2 AA/15.12.2014/2p- 4c/ W.P.(MD)No.19025 of 2014 02.12.2014
Ganesan
The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai
The Inspector of Police, Thiruparankunrand Police Station, Thiruparankunrand, Madurai District
M. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
