D. Vijay Anand, v. B. Sugadev
Case brief
What is this about?
In a civil revision petition under Article 227, the Madurai Bench directed the trial court to dispose of an execution petition within June 2014 due to unnecessary adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the trial court to dispose of the Execution Petition by the end of June 2014.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 23.04.2014 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.935 of 2014
D.Vijay Anand
D.Vimal Anand (died)
.. Revision Petitioner/1st Petitioner/1st Petitioner/Landlord
Vs.
B.Sugadev .. Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/Tenant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Additional District Munsif, Madurai to dispose of E.P.No.131 of 2013 in R.C.O.P.No.35 of 2008 within a time which fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manohar
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of the execution petition within a fixed time.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Vijay Anand
- respondent
B.Sugadev
Coram
T.MATHIVANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court