Saraswathi, v. Pandiammal
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge of the Madras High Court allowed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 seeking to expedite a pending suit. The Court directed the Trial Judge to dispose of the matter within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai to dispose of O.S.No.83 of 2008 within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 16.04.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
C.R.P(MD)No.882 of 2014
Saraswathi .. Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Pandiammal 2.P.K.Rasu
3.Selvi
4.Panchavarnam .. Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned III Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai to expedite the proceedings in O.S.No.83 of 2008 and to dispose the same within a time frame which may be framed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should issue a direction to expedite the trial of the underlying suit O.S.No.83 of 2008?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saraswathi
- respondent
Pandiammal
- respondent
P.K.Rasu
- respondent
Selvi
- respondent
Panchavarnam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court