P.Rajendran, v. a.Ananthi
Case brief
What is this about?
This Revision Petition under Article 226 sought a direction under Article 227 to the trial court to dispose of a suit for nullity of marriage within a fixed time frame due to inordinate delay and failure to file a written statement.
What did the court decide?
Trial court directed to dispose suit within six months after inviting written statement.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 15.04.2014
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
C.R.P(MD)No.859 of 2014
P.Rajendran
.. Petitioner/Plaintiff
Vs.
A.Ananthi .. Respondent/Defendant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the learned Principal District Munsif, Dindigul to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.437 of 2013 within a time frame which may be framed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the trial court under Article 227 of the Constitution to dispose of the suit expeditiously.
Whether the trial court has failed to invite a written statement from the respondent and adjourned the case without reason.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Rajendran
- respondent
A.Ananthi
Coram
T.MATHIVANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court