The Madurai Bench dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution as infructuous since the matter had become so and the necessary endorsement was made.
The Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:11.04.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN
C.R.P(PD)(MD)NO.767 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)NO.1 of 2014
S.Sankara Subramanian ...Petitioner/Respondent/Defentant .vs. Iyappan ...Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order made in I.A.No.99 of 2014 in O.s.No.15 of 2014, dated 11.03.2014, passed by the learned District Munsif, Shencottah.
For Petitioners :M/s.S.Palanivelayutham
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the revision Petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently,connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(R) /True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The District Munsif, Shencottah.
11.04.2014
vsn
pbk 29/04/2014 ::1p-2c:
T.Mathivanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
