Senthil v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a bail petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. The order is a brief disposal with no reasoning or substantive analysis provided.
The court dismissed a bail petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. The order is a brief disposal with no reasoning or substantive analysis provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN
CRL OP(MD) No.1030 of 2014
SENTHIL ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs
THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJADHANI POLICE STATION, THENI DT, CRIME NO.223/2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.SELVAM Advocate
For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
/ TRUE COPY /
TO
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.1030 of 2014 Date :18/02/2014 PA/03.03.2014/1P/3C
SENTHIL
THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJADHANI POLICE STATION, THENI DT
M. SATHYANARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court