R.Arul Raj v. Sabitha
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition filed for non-compliance with a previous order directing payment of pensionary benefits. The petition was dismissed as compliance was established with the hearing.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed as the order dated 20.04.2012 is complied with. No costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.07.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
Contempt Petition No.139 of 2014
R.Arul Raj ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Sabitha,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by the Secretary to the Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.Rameswara Murugan,
The Director of School Education (Hr. Secondary),
College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai – 600 006.
3.R.Easwaran,
The Chief Educational Officer,
Salem,
Salem District. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for the wilful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.10968 of 2012 dated 20.4.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thirupathi For respondent : Mr.V.Subbiah
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed for non-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are guilty of contempt for non-compliance with the order dated 20.4.2012 in W.P.No.10968 of 2012.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Arul Raj
- respondent
Sabitha
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Rameswara Murugan
- respondent
R.Easwaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court