P.Peeriyathambi v. D.Sabitha, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an order in a Writ Petition. The Court noted that the respondent had complied with the order and paid arrears during the pendency, hence the petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as the respondent complied with the Court's order and paid arrears.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2014
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR
CONTEMPT PETITION No.396 of 2014
P.Periyathambi ... Petitioner Vs. D.Sabitha Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Education Department Fort St. George Chennai – 600 009. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act praying to punish the contemner/respondent for wilful and deliberate disobedience and disregard to the Order of this Court in W.P.No.19024 of 2012, dated 23.7.2012. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thennan For Respondent : Ms.A. Sri Jayanthi, Spl.G.P. ORDER This Contempt Petition is filed for the noncompliance of the order made in W.P.No.19024 of 2012, dated 23.7.2012, wherein a direction was issued to the respondent to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.216, Finance (PC) Department, dated 22.3.1993, to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
- During the pendency of the contempt petition, the order of this Court is complied with and the arrears amount payable was also paid to the petitioner on 2.7.2014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of since the respondent has now complied with the earlier order and paid the arrears.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Periyathambi
- respondent
D.Sabitha
Coram
N.Paul Vanthakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court