4.In the year 2001, the dispute between the respondent and one Rengasamy of Illupur in the village, who attempted to interfere with the possession of the respondent's suit property. Therefore, the respondent has filed a suit against Rengasamy in O.S.No.51 of 2001 and decreed the above said suit as prayed for. The appellants occupied the southern portion of the respondent suit property. Recently, on the instigation of the enemical persons of the respondent, the second appellant began to dispute the respondent possession. The first appellant orally ordered the respondent to hand over the possession of the suit property. But the respondents refused to obey the order of the first appellant. Being aggrieved over the same, the appellants 1 and 2 unlawfully planted a board in the suit property as if the suit property belongs to the police department. While the plaintiff questioning the same, the appellants 1 and 2 replied that the property is required for them. Immediately the respondent presented a petition before the third appellant along with all records. After that, the appellants 1 and 2 removed the board, but, all of a sudden, the appellants 1 and 2 broke all the stone pillars. on 10.06.2013 they contented as if the appellants 1 and 2 were allotted 50 cents of land by District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai on 09.04.1986 for construction of Police Station. The above said order passed by the District Revenue Officer is not valid. Since the appellants interfered with the possession of the plaintiff in the suit property, the respondent filed the suit for the relief of permanent injunction against the appellants.
