Allowed

Kumar @ Kumaresan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Nov 2013CRL OP(MD)/20928/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused in a case involving obscene acts and outraging modesty. The court imposed conditions of executing a bond, providing sureties, daily reporting to police, and appearance before the magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail upon executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, daily reporting to police, and appearance before magistrate.

Kumar @ Kumaresan Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2013)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Thirteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.KARUPPIAH

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.20928 of 2013

¶7

1 KUMAR @ KUMARESAN 2 VELLATHAI ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3

¶8

Vs.

¶9

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PILIANGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO.477 OF 2013) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mrs.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, filed this petition pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 355 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act in Crime No.477 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that a criminal case as against the petitioners and one another in Crime No.477 of 2013 was registered by the respondent police and the petitioner is not involved in any other case and injured stands discharged from hospital and A1 in this case was arrested and released on bail.

¶17

The learned Government Advocate also admitted that injured was discharged from hospital.

¶18

Considering the nature of offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners and other factors and considering the fact that injured has been discharged from hospital and that by this time investigation might have been over, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri, on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶21

sd/-

¶22

22/11/2013

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ / TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶25

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶26

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

¶27

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶28

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PILIANGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶29

+1. CC to M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate SR.No.57291 ORDER IN

¶30

PBK 25/11/2013 2P/6C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kumar @ Kumaresan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar @ Kumaresan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sub Inspector of Police, Vs K.S.Manickam

Bhavani Thiyagarajan Vs Velusami Pandian @ Durairaj

Ramanathan, Vs Thiru Neelakandan

Panchavarnam Vs the Inspector of Police

Nallasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

S. Arulraja Vs the Inspector of Police