Disposed
Deepak v. the Inspector of Police
Madras HCCRL OP(MD)/19292/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM CRL OP(MD) No.19292 of 2013
1 DEEPAK 2 JOSEPH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 2 & 3
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNANAPURAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 158 OF 2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A. ROBINSON Advocate
For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned Government Advocate submits that the victim girl was secured.
Recording the said submission, the interim bail already granted is made absolute.
sd/-
20/11/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SATANKULAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT 2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE,BORSTAL SCHOOL AT NANGANERI. 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DT. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MEIGNANAPURAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, 6 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1 CC to M/S.A. ROBINSON Advocate SR.No.56827
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.19292 of 2013
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :20/11/2013
PA/21.11.2013/1P/8C
DEEPAK
JOSEPH
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNANAPURAM POLICE STATION
C.T. SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court