Rajangam v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Tenth day of January Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.175 of 2013
1.RAJANGAM
2.GOBI @ KAMATCHI 3.PERUMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs
STATE REP.BY ITS
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2012 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. B.SUDHA SATHYANANTH Advocate
For Respondent : MR. P.JOTHI, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that no crime has been registered against the petitioners and no petition is pending against the petitioners with the respondent police.
2.Recording the above submission, the petition is hereby closed.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT, 2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S. B.SUDHA SATHYANANTH Advocate SR.No.1502
CRL OP(MD) No.175 of 2013
TR : 11.01.2013 : 1P/4C
RAJANGAM
GOBI @ KAMATCHI
PERUMAL
STATE
C.T. SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court