Petitioners seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn after noting that the case had been transferred to a different police station.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Tenth day of January Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.129 of 2013
1.ESAKKI MUTHU 2.NAVANEETHA KRISHNAN 3.SHENBAGAVALLI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3
Vs
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THENKASI, TIRUNELVELI DT. (CR.NO.36/2012) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. N.NOHIDEEN BASHA Advocate
For Respondent : MR. P.JOTHI, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the case has been transferred to Puliyangulam Police Station, Coimbatore.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move afresh.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
TR : 23.01.2013 : 1P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ESAKKI MUTHU
NAVANEETHA KRISHNAN
SHENBAGAVALLI
STATE
C.T. SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
