Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel withdrew the petition. Court recorded withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of September Two Thousand Thirteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.T.SELVAM
CRL OP(MD) No.11275 of 2013
KASIMAYAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.6 Vs
THE STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 140 OF 2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.ANAND Advocate
For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
17/09/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NATHAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.11275 of 2013 Date :17/09/2013 PA/23.09.13/1P/3C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KASIMAYAN
THE STATE
C.T.SELVAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
