Multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 were dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court for non-prosecution due to lack of petitioner representation on two occasions. The petitioner failed to have any appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:06.07.2011
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)Nos.4983 to 4986 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011(in all W.Ps) P.Ponnusamy .. Petitioner in all W.Ps Vs.
1.The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, District Court Complex, Theni District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Theni District. 3.The District Revenue Officer-cum Competent Authority, TN Protection of Interests Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act, 1997, Theni. .. Respondents 1 to 3 in all W.Ps 4.S.Kamatchiammal .. 4th Respondent in W.P.No.4983/2011 5.M.Vimala .. 4th Respondent in W.P.No.4984/2011 6.S.Kamatchiammal .. 4th respondent in W.P.No.4985/2011 7.Subbusami Gowdar .. 4th respondent in W.P.No.4986/2011
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of E.A.Nos.104, 105, 106 and 107 of 2008 in C.C.Nos.11, 12, 13 and 14 of 2008, dated 10.11.2008 on the file of the first respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to transfer the same to the Special Court under TNPID Act at Madurai as per the provisions of Section 6(3) of TNPID Act, 1997.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.TR.Janarthanam Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For R4 : No Appearance( In all W.Ps)
2
C O M M O N O R D E R
On two occasions (i.e) on 29.04.2011 and 16.06.2011, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and hence, the matters were adjourned. It appears that the petitioner is not serious in pursuing the matters. Accordingly, these Writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
pm
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar[RTI Act]
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, District Court Complex, Theni District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Theni District.
3.The District Revenue Officer-cum Competent Authority, TN Protection of Interests Depositors (In Financial Establishment) Act, 1997, Theni. +4 ccs Special Government Pleader, SR.No.21972 to 21975.
W.P.(MD)Nos.4983 to 4986 of 2011
Dated:06.07.2011
2P/8C RPB 14.07.2011
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Ponnusamy
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Deputy Superintendent of Police
District Revenue Officer
R. Sudhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
