Dismissed

M.K.S. Chandharasekara, v. the Inspector General

Madras HC5 Jul 2011WP(MD)/6613/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought cancellation of illegally registered sale deeds under Article 226. The petitioner was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the civil court. The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the civil court; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.

M.K.S. Chandharasekara, Vs the Inspector General — Property and Title | Madras HC (2011)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.(MD)No.6613 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011

¶3

M.K.S.Chandharasekara ... Petitioner

¶4

Vs.

¶5

1.The Inspector General (Registration), Santham High Road, Chennai.

¶6

2.The District Collector, Tuticorin District.

¶7

3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District.

¶8

4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Kadambur, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to cancel the sale deeds which were illegally registered before the fourth respondent in sale deeds documents Nos.493, 494, 641, 642, 902, 1077, 1381, 1850, 1851/2008, 736/2009 and 739/2009 for the period from 17.04.2008 to 01.06.2009 on the basis of the letter by the third respondent dated 08.06.2010 in Na.Mu.Ka.No.4808/AA1/2009.

¶10

For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Ramasamy

¶11

For Respondents ... Mr.TR.Janarthanam, Additional Govt. Pleader

¶12

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the civil Court for cancellation of the sale deeds and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶15

Giving liberty as above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar (A.E)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

/True Copy/

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar (C.S)

¶21

¶22

To:

¶23

1.The Inspector General (Registration), Santham High Road, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tuticorin District. 3.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Kadambur, Tuticorin District. + 1 cc to Mr.S.Ramasamy, Advocate, SR No.21958 + 1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR No.21852

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.6613 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 05.07.2011

¶25

rsb RJ/13.7.11 2p/7c

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.K.S. Chandharasekara, v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.K.S. Chandharasekara, v. the Inspector General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Parasuraman, Vs the Tahsildar

K. Paramasivan, Vs the Commissioner

Jeyakaranponsingh, Vs the Principal Home Secretary

R.Veluchamy Vs the Divisional Engineer

R.Gowshik, S/O.Devadoss, Vs the Executive Officer

J. Suseela, Vs the Tamilnadu Principal