Disposed

Ammini Emmanuel v. Kodamthuruthu Grama Panchayath

Kerala HC27 May 2024WP(C)/9064/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cross writ petitions over claimed relinquishment of 15 cents of land for a Family Health Centre in Kodamthuruth Village. The court found no documents proving the relinquishment and directed the District Collector to conduct an enquiry into the register entry and take a final decision after hearing both sides, considering the pending civil suit.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ammini Emmanuel Vs Kodamthuruthu Grama Panchayath — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶4

MONDAY, THE 27^TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 20065 OF 2022

¶5

PETITIONER:

¶6

HENTRY JOHNSON,AGED 69 YEARS,S/O. JOHNSON, ARATTUKULAM HOUSE, S. EZHUPUNNA, ALAPPUZHA 688 535.

¶7

BY ADV K.V.SABU

¶8

RESPONDENTS:

¶9

1 SECRETARY,KODAMTHURUTH GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KUTHIYATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT 688 533.

¶10

2 VILLAGE OFFICER,KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, KUTHIYATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA 688 533.

¶11

3 TAHSILDAR (LR), CHERTHALA TALUK OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, 688 524.

¶12

4 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.

¶13

5 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA 688 001.

¶14

6 DIRECTOR, PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695 034.

¶15

7 SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 004.

¶16

8 ADDL.R8:SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA-688 012. (ADDL.R8 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 05-07-2022 IN IA

¶17

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 2

¶18

1/2022).

¶19

9 ADDL.R9. AMMINI EMMANUEL , AGED 92 YEARS, W/O. EMMAUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O., EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-688 537.

¶20

10 ADDL.R10. VICTOR GEORGE @ BENNY, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O. EMMAUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O., EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-688 537.

¶21

11 ADDL.R11. JOSEPH MATHEW @ BAIJU, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. EMMAUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O., EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-688 537.

¶22

12 ADDL.R12. MARTIN EMMANUEL , AGED 62 YEARS, W/O. EMMAUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O., EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN-688 537. ( ADDL.R9 TO R12 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 29-11-2022 IN IA 2/2022)

¶23

BY ADVS. R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SABINA JAYAN C.JOSEPH JOHNY SAMSON MATHEW SAM

¶24

OTHER PRESENT:

¶25

GP- DEEPA V

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.05.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).9064/2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶27

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 3

¶28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶29

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM MONDAY, THE 27^TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 9064 OF 2023

¶30

PETITIONERS:

¶31

1 AMMINI EMMANUEL AGED 92 YEARS W/O EMMANUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O, EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST, KERALA STATE, PIN - 688537

¶32

2 VICTOR GEORGE @ BENNY AGED 67 YEARS S/O EMMANUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O,EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST, KERALA STATE, PIN - 688537

¶33

3 JOSEPH MATHEW @ BAIJU AGED 65 YEARS S/O EMMANUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O,EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST, KERALA STATE, PIN - 688537

¶34

4 MARTIN EMMANUEL AGED 62 YEARS S/O EMMANUEL KARUMANCHERRIL FAMILY, RESIDING AT AZHEEPARAMBU BUNGLOW, EZHUPUNNA P.O,EZHUPUNNA SOUTH MURI, KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DIST, KERALA STATE, PIN - 688537

¶35

BY ADVS. JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD C.JOSEPH JOHNY

¶36

RESPONDENTS:

¶37

1 KODAMTHURUTHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH KODAMTHURUTHU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KUTHIYATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA REPRESENTED BY ITS

¶38

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 4

¶39

SECRETARY, PIN - 688533

¶40

2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER KODAMTHURUTHU VILLAGE KUTHIYATHODU P.O, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688533

¶41

3 THE TAHASILDAR (LR), CHERTHALA TALUK OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA DIST, PIN - 688524

¶42

4 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER , ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688001

¶43

5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTRATE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688001

¶44

6 THE DIRECTOR

¶45

PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICE, PALAYAM, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695034

¶46

7 THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

¶47

8 SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688012

¶48

9 HENTRY JOHNSON AGED 69 YEARS S/O JOHNSON ARATTUKULAM HOUSE, S. EZHUPUNNA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688535

¶49

BY ADVS. SABINA JAYAN Adv.K.V.Sabu

¶50

GP- DEEPA V

¶51

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.05.2024, ALONG WITH WP(C).20065/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶52

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023

¶53

VIJU ABRAHAM,J

¶54

Dated this the 27^th day of May, 2023

¶55

JUDGMENT

¶56

WP(C)No.20065 of 2022 is filed seeking a

¶57

direction to the 5^th respondent District Collector to identify the land assigned for Family Welfare Centre on the basis of the records maintained by the 2^nd respondent Village Officer.

¶58

It is averred in the said writ petition that

¶59

the petitioner's father was a manager of a factory owned by his uncle Shri.George Peter. The parents of Shri.George Peter has given 15 cents of property to the Panchayath free of cost for starting a Public Health Centre. Before this transaction happened and even before the Independence of India, George Peter has assigned 34 cents of land behind the property assigned to the Public Health Centre in favour of the petitioner's father and the petitioner's father has constructed a residential

¶60

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 6

¶61

building in the said property even before the

¶62

Independence and thereafter, the petitioner and his family are residing in the said house. Even though 15 cents of land has surrendered as free of cost to the Health Department, the department is using only 3.80 Ares and constructed a Family Welfare Centre therein. Before the assignment of the said land, petitioner's family used to reach the public road through that property. It is further contended that during 1979, heirs of George Peter registered the said 34 cents of land in favour of the petitioner's

¶63

father, but unfortunately there was a mistake in recording the extent of land, though the measurement has been accurately mentioned in the deed. Subsequently, the petitioner's father gave the property to his eldest son, the brother of the petitioner in 1994 and thereafter the said property was assigned in the name of the petitioner and thereafter he is using the same as a residential property. It is further averred that subsequently the grand son of George Peter has trespassed into the property assigned for public Health Centre and

¶64

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 7

¶65

constructed a temporary fencing prohibiting the petitioner from entering into his house through the main gate. Thereupon, the petitioner approached the authority concerned. As per Ext.P1, the local authority informed the petitioner that necessary measurement has to be done by the revenue department. Thereupon, the petitioner submitted a request before the Tahsildar (LR), Cherthala, the 3^rd respondent herein for identifying the puramboke land having an extent of 15 cents in Survey No.92/9-1 of Kodamthuruth Village. By Ext.P2 proceedings necessary direction was issued to measure the property and determined the property which has been surrendered for the Family Planning

¶66

Centre. Petitioner relies on Ext.P3, relevant records of the said land issued by the Village Officer, Kodamthuruth to show that 15 cents of land comprised in Survey No.92/9-1 was relinquished for the Family Planning Centre as per order No.B1421/70 dated 09.01.1970. Petitioner contended that inspite of identifying the puramboke land respondents 1 and

¶67

2 are not taken any steps to remove the

¶68

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 8

¶69

encroachment upon the puramboke land. Since no

¶70

action was taken, the petitioner approached the 4^th respondent, RDO, Alappuzha to take appropriate action against the unauthorised use and trespass of

¶71

the public property. The 4^th respondent after verifying the matter directed respondents 1 and 3 to take immediate action for demarcation of the public property from the unauthorized occupation as per Exts.P6 and P7 proceedings. In spite of the same, no action has been taken by the respondents 1,2 and 6 to identify the puramboke land and its

¶72

trespass. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.

¶73

When the matter came up for consideration earlier, this Court as per order dated 5.7.2022 issued a direction to the 5^th respondent to identify the land assigned for the 6^th respondent and the property that belongs to the Family Welfare Centre

¶74

in Kodamthuruth Village in Survey No.92/9-1 extending to 6.07 Ares of land. Consequently, the Taluk Survey authority conducted a detailed investigation and survey and demarcated the land

¶75

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 9

¶76

allotted for Family Health Centre having an extent of 6.07 Ares and directed the local authority to take steps to evict the encroachment.

¶77

A Counter affidavit has been filed by the 1^st respondent specifically contending that any action for evicting the encroachment can be taken only when the extent of the encroached puramboke is identified by the survey authority.

¶78

Respondents 9 to 12 got impleaded as

¶79

additional respondents in the writ petition and filed a detailed counter affidavit. They have

¶80

denied the contention of the petitioner that the

¶81

father of George Peter has given 15 cents of

¶82

property to the Panchayath as free of cost for starting a public health centre. They contend that

¶83

the mode of said transfer or the date of said transfer or any other relevant details of the

¶84

alleged transfer were not disclosed by the

¶85

petitioner in the writ petition. It is further stated that George Peter has assigned 34 cents of

¶86

land behind the property assigned on the public

¶87

health centre in favour of the petitioner's father

¶88

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 10

¶89

even before the independence of India is also a false statement. In fact the grand father of the respondents, George Peter has executed a settlement deed bearing No.2313/1952 of Arookutty SRO in

¶90

favour of all his sons including the respondents father, Peter Immanuel. Therefore, the contention that the respondents' grandfather had assigned 34 cents of property to the father of the petitioner is absolutely without any basis. It is contended that the writ petitioner is having property on the eastern and southern side of the respondents property which was purchased by the father of the petitioner from the father of the respondents' Sri.Peter Emmanuel and his brothers and the extent of the property is only 22 cents. They further contend that the extent of property now held by the petitioner is about 34 cents and there are no documents evidencing the transfer of the said

¶91

extent of land to the father of the petitioner. It is only to validate his encroachment of the nearby

¶92

properties, he wants to make necessary modifications in the revenue records. In fact the

¶93

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 11

¶94

Family Health Centre was started and functioning on

¶95

the southern portion of the large extent of

¶96

property belonging to the respondents and permission was granted for such construction on a temporary basis and on the understanding that the building would be demolished at their cost on the request made by the respondents and permission was given to construct a building in an extent of 4 cents of property and further that there is no relinquishment of 15 cents of property or any other property belonging to the grandfather of the petitioner and any property in favour of the health department. As per Exts.R9(a), R9(b) and R9(c), the Primary Health Centre Vallathodu, Taluk Office Cherthala and Sub Collector, Alappuzha respectively had submitted that no records are available with them evidencing any relinquishment of property in respect of the above 15 cents of property comprised in Survey No.92/9-1. The intention of the writ petitioner is to create a road into his property, it seems that the interested persons with the connivance of the employees in the Village Office

¶97

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 12

¶98

of Kodamthuruthu Village managed to create

¶99

fraudulent entries in the basic tax records and

¶100

other documents and made wrong entries to the effect that a relinquishment of the immovable

¶101

property was granted in favour of the Health Department. Further it is the contention that the grandfather of the petitioner has relinquished 15 cents of property to the Panchayath as free of cost for starting a primary health centre is without any basis. In Ext.P3 it is seen that the relinquishment was done on 19.01.1970 whereas the grandfather of the respondents died on 3.4.1967 and therefore, the entries in the BTR and other records regarding the relinquishment has been made fraudulently by the interested persons subsequently. In respect of the property covered in Survey No.92/9-1 the respondents have already filed a suit as O.S.No.326/2018 before the Munsiff Court, Cherthala

¶102

for declaration of title of the property comprised in Survey No.92/9-1 in which the petitioner is a defendant and the Civil Court has passed Ext.R9(g) interim order in the said suit restraining the

¶103

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 13

¶104

respondent and his men and agents until further

¶105

orders from further trespassing into item No.1 property and from constructing road through it. Petitioner submits that it is suppressing all these facts and without impleading them as a party that the present writ petition has been filed and the

¶106

same is without any bonafides, and further submitted that without bringing out all these aspects to the notice of the court that the court has issued an interim order on 5.7.2022 to measure

¶107

and demarcate the property and therefore, he has

¶108

also sought for recalling the said interim order.

¶109

WP(C) No.9064 of 2023 is filed by the

¶110

respondents 9 to 12 in WP(C) No.20065 of 2022

¶111

praying for an order challenging Ext.P4, which is produced as Ext.P10 in the other writ petition. Petitioner also sought for setting aside the

¶112

entries in Ext.P8 relating to the alleged

¶113

relinquishment of the property comprised in Survey No.92/9-1 of Kodamthuruthu Village and also sought

¶114

for an enquiry by the 5^th respondent with the said

¶115

entries regarding the alleged relinquishment. In

¶116

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 14

¶117

the said writ petition, the petitioners have reiterated the contention taken in the counter affidavit filed in WP(C) No.20065/2022.

¶118

Petitioners also submit that the entries in Ext.P8 is suspicious in as much as the survey number is seen recorded in an ascending order and the ascending sequence of recording the survey number has been violated only in respect of Serial No.31

¶119

and it would show that the entry in Serial No.31 is subsequently incorporated. It is also the

¶120

contention of the petitioners that Serial No.31 in

¶121

Ext.P8 puramboke register concerning Survey No.92/9-1 is written in a different handwriting and in the remarks column the details of the alleged proceedings, No.B1421/70 dated 9.1.70 is

¶122

incorporated. It is also contended that it is not known which authority had issued the proceedings and on enquiry conducted by the petitioners they are informed that no such proceeding is available. It is further contended that by Ext.P15 document the extent of the land transferred to the father of the petitioners is only 22 cents and the contention

¶123

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 15

¶124

that they are in possession of 34 cents of land is absolutely without any basis.

¶125

I have heard the rival contention on both sides.

¶126

The conduct of the petitioner in WP(C)

¶127

No.20065 of 2022 in not impleading the necessary

¶128

parties, who are the petitioners in the other writ

¶129

petition as WP(C) No.9064 of 2023 is totally

¶130

unacceptable, especially when there is a specific averment in the writ petition that the grandson of Mr.George Peter had trespassed into the property assigned for public health centre and constructed a temporary fence prohibiting the petitioner from entering into his house through the main gate. Though it is averred in the writ petition in WP(C) No.20065/2022 that an extent of 15 cents of land was relinquished to the Government for construction of a Family Health Centre, no documents have been

¶131

produced to show that the property was infact relinquished to the Panchayath for construction of a Public Health Centre. The documents produced as

¶132

Exts.R9(a) to Ext.R9(c) would reveal that no

¶133

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 16

¶134

documents are available with the authorities to

¶135

show that 15 cents of land has been relinquished

¶136

for construction of the Family Health Centre. Yet another aspect to be considered is the contention

¶137

of the counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No.20065/2022 that parents of George Peter have

¶138

given 15 cents of property to the Panchayath for starting a Public Health Centre. The proceedings of relinquishment even as per the entries in Ext.P8 is dated 9.01.1970 and the grandfather of the petitioners, George Peter had in fact died on

¶139

3.4.1967 as is evident from Ext.P9 certificate

¶140

issued by the Parish Church Register. On the basis of the same it is contended the averment that the

¶141

grandfather of the petitioners in WP(C) No.9064/2023 has relinquished 15 cents of property

¶142

to the Panchayath is absolutely without any basis.

¶143

Even though a perusal of Ext.P3 in WP(C)

¶144

No.20065/2022 would show that there is a

¶145

proceedings issued as B1421/70 dated 9.1.1970 to the effect that an extent of 15 cents of land in Survey No.92/9-1 has been relinquished for starting

¶146

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 17

¶147

a Family Planning Centre, no such order is

¶148

forthcoming either from the petitioners in WP(C)

¶149

No.9064/2023 or from any of the official respondents. Even though the petitioner in WP(C) No.20065/2022 would contend that the petitioners' father was assigned 34 cents of land even before the Independence, as per Ext.P15 produced in WP(C) No.9064/2023 the actual extent of property is only 22 cents. It is also to be noted that alleging encroachment upon the property, the petitioners in WP(C) No.9064/2023 has preferred OS No.326/2018 which is pending before the Munsiff Court, Cherthala and that Ext.R9(g) injunction has been granted against the petitioner in WP(C) No.20065/2022.

¶150

After hearing the learned counsel appearing on both sides, and also the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that the issue regarding the relinquishment of 15 cents of land and Ext.P3 register produced in WP(C) No.20065/2022 showing that an extent of 15 cents of land in Survey No.92/9-1 has been relinquished for a Family

¶151

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 18

¶152

Planning Centre as per proceedings No. B1421/70 dated 9.1.1970 has to be enquired into by a higher authority.

¶153

Therefore, the above writ petitions are

¶154

disposed of with a direction that the 5^th respondent shall conduct an enquiry into the said aspect and take a final decision in the matter after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner in WP(C) No.20065/2022 and also the respondents 9 to 12, who are the petitioners in WP(C) No.9064/2023. The petitioners in WP(C) No.9064/2023 shall make an

¶155

appropriate request in this regard before the 5^th respondent within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment and the 5^th respondent shall take appropriate decision on the same, after affording an opportunity of being heard as directed above. Till a decision is taken as directed above, the interim order granted by this Court on 16.3.2023 in WP(C) No.9064/2023 shall continue to be in force. The 5^th respondent while taking a decision as directed above, shall also take into consideration the pendency of civil suit

¶156

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 19 before the Additional Munsiff Court, Cherthala as OS No.326/2018.

¶157

sd/-

¶158

VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE

¶159

¶160

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 20

¶161

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9064/2023

¶162

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS

¶163

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO. 2313/1952 DATED OF 07-07-1952 OF S.R.O. AROOKUTTY Exhibit P2 . THE TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 3341/1993 DATED 03-12-1993 OF S.R.O. KUTHIYATHODE Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 2028/1979 DATED 18-05-1979 OF S.R.O. KUTHIYATHODU EXECUTED BY PETER EMMANUEL AND HIS BROTHERS IN FAVOUR OF A.T. SOLOMAN Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. 16113/18 DATED NIL -11-2022 ISSUED BY TAHASILDAR LAND RECORDS, CHERTHALA TALUK TO THE SECRETARY OF THE KODAMTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH ALONG WITH SKETCH Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. 598/2022 DATED 05-11-2022 ISSUED FROM PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE VALLATHODU Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. B1/595/2022/RDOALP DATED 15-09-2022 ISSUED BY SUB COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. H5.2827/2019 DATED 24-09-2022 ISSUED BY TALUK OFFICE, CHERTHALA Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 20/2022/RI DATED 12-01-2021 ALONG WITH RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PURAMPOKE REGISTER ISSUED BY THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER OF THE KODAMTHURUTU VILLAGE OFFICE Exhibit P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE PARISH PRIEST OF ST. ANTONY'S CHURCH, EZHUPUNNA, AS PER THE ENTRIES IN THE REGISTER KEPT IN THE CHURCH

¶164

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 21

¶165

Exhibit P10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT NO. 4 IN BOOK NO. 433 DATED 2-12-1993 OF VILLAGE OFFICE KODAMTHURUTHU, UNDER THANDAPPER NO. 700 ALONG WITH ITS READABLE COPY Exhibit P11 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO. H5 16113/18 ALONG WITH LETTER NO. H5.2827/2019 DATED 5-8-2022 ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION Exhibit P12 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO.326/2018 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT CHERTHALA Exhibit P13 THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 9TH RESPONDENT HEREIN AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT IN O.S NO. 326/2018 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT CHERTHALA Exhibit P14 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED: 29-062018 IN I.A NO. 1559/2018 IN O.S NO. 326/2018 OF THE HON'BLE MUNSIFF COURT CHERTHALA Exhibit P15 The true copy of the document No. 1169/1994 dated 16-04-1994 of SRO Kuthiyathodu Exhibit P16 The true copy of the document No. 1274/1998 dated 14-05-1998 of SRO Kuthiyathodu

¶166

W.P.(C).Nos.20065 of 2022 & 9064 of 2023 22

¶167

¶168

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶169

Exhibit P1	A COPY OF THE LETT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESP	ER DT. 24.08.2 ONDENT.	021
Exhibit P2	A COPY OF THE PROCE RESPONDENT DT. 14.08.2	EDINGS OF THE 018.	3RD
Exhibit P3	COPY OF THE RELEVANT THE LAND IN SY. KODAMTHURUTH VILLAGE.	BASIC RECORDS NO. 92/9-1	OF OF
Exhibit P4	A COPY OF THE PROCEE OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.	DINGS DT. 2.8.2	018
Exhibit P5	COPY OF THE ROUGH S THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT.	KETCH PREPARED 11.10.2018.	BY
Exhibit P6	A COPY OF THE LETTER THE 1ST RESPONDENT.	DT. 21.10.2020	TO
Exhibit P7	A COPY OF THE LETTER THE 3RD RESPONDENT.	DT. 9.11.2020	TO
Exhibit P8	COPY OF THE LETTER D BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.	T. 5.8.2021 ISS	UED
Additional Exhibit P9	A copy of the Field Tahsildar (LR), Cherth	No.92/9 issued ala	by
Additional Exhibit P10	A copy of the let issued by the Tahsi Secretary, Kodam Panchayath	ter dt.11.11.2 ldar (LR) to thuruth Gr	022 the ama

Ammini Emmanuel v. Kodamthuruthu Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ammini Emmanuel v. Kodamthuruthu Grama Panchayath

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Valsalakumari Vs State of Kerala

Giyomol K Sasi Vs State of Kerala

Sandhia Vs the State of Kerala Represented by the District Collector

T. Vijayan Vs the District Collector

Vijayan K.K. Vs National Highways Authority of India - NHAI

Hentry Johnson, Vs Secretary