garden land for decades together. Petitioner’s residential building was constructed in the said land in the year 1975 along with other structures situated therein. Petitioner in fact has submitted an application as early as in the year 2018 for conversion of the land, only after intervention of this Court as per judgment in W.P (C) No.12608 of 2018 the application was considered and as per Ext.P2 dated June 2022 the land was excluded from the data bank and mutation has been effected as converted dry land. The National Highway authorities had notified an extent of 1.29 Ares of property (3.188 cents) in survey no.154/2-2 of Thuravoor South Village for acquisition for the widening of NH vide notification dated 24.01.2020; however instead of dry land, the same is wrongly notified as wetland and the value for wet land has been awarded as compensation as evident from Ext.P3. Petitioner submits that aggrieved by the amount of compensation awarded he has preferred an Arbitration Appeal before the 2nd respondent and the same is pending consideration. Petitioner relies on Ext.P4 judgment wherein relief has been granted in similar circumstances. Petitioner has also raised another grievance that an extent of 2 cents of land in survey no.154/2-2 of Thuravoor South Village, due to the boundary fixation by the revenue authorities, is now lying in Pattanakkad Village in survey no.21/20 and that 2 cents of land in survey no.21/20 of the Pattanakkad Village is also coming under the alignment of acquisition, but no compensation was awarded for the said extent of land. Petitioner submits that he is entitled to get compensation for the above extent of 2 cents of land also, which has in physical possession of the
