Tara.G., v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging bank transfer order stayed. Court limits prayer to latest transfer application, directs competent authority to consider it, and retains petitioner in current post pending outcome.
What did the court decide?
The Court directed the competent person/2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's transfer application dated 4.03.2024 and retain the petitioner in her current post until then.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1945
W.P.(C) NO.3625 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
THARA.G., AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.HELENCE BUOY,
DEPUTY MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, THANGASSERY BRANCH
(UNDER ORDERS OF TRANSFER), KOLLAM 691 007, RESIDING AT
"NEDDOM" EDAMANAKAVU, KARAVANAD P.O., KOLLAM 691 003.
BY ADVS.
T.C.GOVINDASWAMY
KALA T.GOPI
B.NAMADEVA PRABHU
SHINE S.
RESPONDENTS:
1THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA, STATE BANK BHAVAN,
MADAM CAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400 021.
MAHARASHTRA.
2THE GENERAL MANAGER (NW-1),
STATE BANK OF INDIA, HR DEPARTMENT, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE,
POOJAPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 012.
3THE REGIONAL MANAGER I, STATE BANK OF INDIA,
REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-1, KOLLAM-691 013.
4SRI. PRADEEP R. CHANDRAN, THE REGIONAL MANAGER I,
STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-I,
KOLLAM-691 013.
5THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA,
THANGASSERY BRANCH, KOLLAM-691 007.
BY ADVS.
GEORGE THOMAS (MEVADA)(SR.)
K.S.SAJEEV KUMAR, FOR-R4
AMAL GEORGE FOR R1 TO R3 & R5
BISMI T.A.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner will be allowed to seek transfer from Thangassery Branch to A.O., Thiruvananthapuram.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thara.G.
- respondent
The Chairman, State Bank of India
- respondent
The General Manager (NW-1), State Bank of India
- respondent
The Regional Manager I, State Bank of India
- respondent
Sri. Pradeep R. Chandran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court