The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 31414 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
BABY JASEENA AGED 44 YEARS W/O.AJITH KUMAR, ALINKADAVU MARATHOOR, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. K.M.JAMALUDHEEN LATHA PRABHAKARAN SEEMA T.J. BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
: 2 :
W.P.(C) No.31414 of 2018
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE
sm/
BABY JASEENA
THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES NADAKKAVE BRANCH
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (REVENUE RECOVERY)
TALUK SURVEYOR
SASINDRA RAJ
BABY JAMUNA
VIJU ABRAHAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
