Jaison Chacko v. Tez Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of two matrimonial appeals by incorporating the parties’ executed settlement agreement obtained through mediation into the judgment.
What did the court decide?
The appeals were disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Agreement between the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V &
THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICEP.M.MANOJ
MONDAY,THE27THDAYOFMAY2024/6THJYAISHTA,1946
MAT.APPEALNO.723OF2023
AGAINSTTHEORDER/JUDGMENTDATED22.02.2023INOPNO.527OF2019
OFFAMILYCOURT,ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
JAISONCHACKO
AGED35YEARS
S/OP.M.CHACKO,PONGANATHADAM,AMMANCHERY,AMALAGIRI
P.O,PERUMBAIKADVILLAGE,KOTTAYAM,PIN-686561
BYADVS.
NISAMOLP.H.
PRABHAJOSE
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
TEZTHOMAS
AGED33YEARS
D/OK.M.THOMAS,W/OJAISONCHACKO,AMBALAKANDATHIL
HOUSE,KALAVOORP.O.,KALAVOORVILLAGE,ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT,NOWATMIQUAGENERALHOSPITAL,ALIOUF,SAUDI
ARABIA,PIN-688522
BYADVS.
C.V.MANUVILSAN
NAEEMIBRAHIM(K/374-P/2000)
O.A.ANJU(K/000515/2018)
AJITHAKUMARIM.M.(K/000846/2022)
VRINDALAKSHMANAN(K/001663/2023)
THISMATRIMONIALAPPEALHAVINGCOMEUPFORFINALHEARINGON
27.05.2024,ALONGWITHMat.Appeal.754/2023,THECOURTONTHESAME
DAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:
Mat Appeal Nos.723 of 2023 & 754 of 2023
Parties & counsel
- appellant
JAISON CHACKO
- respondent
TEZ THOMAS
Coram
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court