Disposed

K.P Fathima @ Pathootty v. Pradeep Kumar.R

Kerala HC28 May 2024Con.Case(C)/1055/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two civil contempt cases arising from land acquisition-related proceedings against the Thalassery Municipality and District Collector were settled amicably through mediation at the District Mediation Centre, Thalassery. The court closed both contempt cases recording the settlement.

What did the court decide?

Both contempt cases closed recording mediation settlement dated 08.04.2024

K.P Fathima @ Pathootty Vs Pradeep Kumar.R — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946

¶5

CON.CASE(C) NO. 837 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONERS:

¶7

1 K.P. FATHIMA @ PATHOOTTY, W/O. MAKKI, BAVAS, NEAR DISITRICT COURT, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670101.

¶8

2 SUHARA K.P., W/O. C.K. HARIS, AL- HILAL, CHETTAMKUNNU, THALASSERY, KANNUR -670101.

¶9

3 MARIYU K.P., W/O. UMMER, RAHMA, KAYYATH ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670101.

¶10

4 KUNHALU K.P., W/O. COT SADDIQUE, IQRAH, KEYYATH ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670101.

¶11

5 AYISHA BEEVI, W/O. SHAFEEQUE, HIBA VEA, S.B. COLONY ROAD, CHETTAKUNNU, THALASSERY, KANNUR -670101.

¶12

BY ADV CIBI THOMAS

¶13

RESPONDENTS:

¶14

1 PRADEEP KUMAR R., THE SECRETARY, THALASSERY MUNICIPALITY, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670101.

¶15

2 S. CHANDRASHEKAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR-687002.

¶16

SC – ADV. I. V. PRAMOD

¶17

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, ALONG WITH Con.Case(C).1055/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶19

PRESENT

¶20

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶21

TUESDAY, THE 28^TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946

¶22

CON.CASE(C) NO. 1055 OF 2022

¶23

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN AS NO.537 OF 2000 OF HIGH COURT

¶24

OF KERALA

¶25

PETITIONERS:

¶26

1 K.P FATHIMA @ PATHOOTTY AGED 67 YEARS WIFE OF MAKKI, BAVAS, NEAR DISTRICT COURT, THALASSERY, KANNUR - 670 101., PIN - 670101 2 SUHARA.K.P W/O. C.K HARIS, AL-HILAL, CHETTAMKUNNU, THALASSERY, KANNUR - 670 101., PIN - 670101 3 MARIYU .K.P W/O. K.UMMER, RAHMA, KAYYATH ROAD, THALASSERY KANNUR - 670 101., PIN - 670101

¶27

4 KUNHALU. K.P WIFE OF COT SADDIQUE, IQRAH, KEYYATH ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR - 670 101., PIN - 670101

¶28

5 AYISHA BEEVI W/O. SHAFEEQUE, HIBA VEA, S.B COLONY ROAD, CHETTAKUNNU, THALASSERY, KANNUR - 670 101, PIN - 670101 BY ADV CIBI THOMAS

¶29

RESPONDENTS:

¶30

1 PRADEEP KUMAR.R THE SECRETARY, THALASSERY MUNICIPALITY, THALASSERY, KANNUR - 670 101., PIN - 670101 2 S. CHANDRASHEKAR DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR- 670 002.

¶31

BY ADV ADV. K. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶32

OTHER PRESENT:

¶33

SR.GP- DEEPA NARAYANAN

¶34

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, ALONG WITH Con.Case(C).837/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶35

Cont. Case (C) Nos.837 & 1055 of 2022 : 3 :

¶36

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

¶37

- - - - Cont. Case (C) Nos.837 & 1055 of 2022

¶38

- - - - Dated this the 28^th day of May, 2024

¶39

JUDGMENT

¶40

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned standing counsel for the 1^st respondent Municipality submit that the matter has been amicably settled in mediation held at the District Mediation Centre, District Court Complex, Thalassery and a copy of the mediation report has been forwarded to this Court as per letter No.M.224/2023 dated 09.04.2024. Both sides submit that the Contempt of Court Cases may be closed recording the settlement.

¶41

In view of the same, the above Contempt of Court Cases are closed recording the settlement as per the mediation agreement executed on 08.04.2024.

¶42

Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

¶43

sm/

¶44

Cont. Case (C) Nos.837 & 1055 of 2022 : 4 :

¶45

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 837/2022

¶46

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶47

Annexure I	CERTIFIED NO.15637/20	COPY OF 12 DATED	THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 23/07/2013.
Annexure II	TRUE COPY IN CC 2276 COURT.	OF THE O 1/2013 OF	RDER DATED 13/01/2014 THE HON'BLE SUPREME
Annexure III	TRUE COPY NO.1565/201	OF THE 3 DATED 0	JUDGMENT WRIT APPEAL 6/08/2014.
Annexure IV	TRUE COPY 30/09/2014 JUDGMENTS OFFICER, TH	OF THE SUBMITT BEFORE T ALASSERY.	COVERING LETTER DATED ED ALONG WITH THE HE LAND ACQUISITION
Annexure V	TRUE COPY SUBMITTED B	OF T EFORE THE	HE COVERING LETTER DISTRICT COLLECTOR.
Annexure VI	TRUE COPY 10/09/2014 THALASSERY	OF THE ISSUED MUNICIPAL	COMMUNICATION DATED BY THE SECRETARY OF ITY.
Annexure VII	TRUE COPY 18/10/2014 THALASSERY	OF THE ISSUED MUNICIPAL	COMMUNICATION DATED BY THE SECRETARY, ITY.
Annexure VIII	TRUE COPY PETITIONER	OF THE DATED 29/	REPLY BY THE 1ST 10/2014.
Annexure VIII(A)	TRUE COP EVIDENCING MUNICIPALIT	Y OF T THE RECE Y.	HE POSTAL RECEIPT IPT OF REPLY BY THE
Annexure IX	TRUE COPY 23/12/2014.	OF THE	COMMUNICATION DATED
Annexure X	TRUE COPY 10/07/2019	OF THE ISSUED BY	COMMUNICATION DATED THE MUNICIPALITY.
Annexure XI	TRUE COPY 13/08/2019.	OF THE	COMMUNICATION DATED

¶48

Cont. Case (C) Nos.837 & 1055 of 2022 : 5 :

¶49

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1055/2022

¶50

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶51

Annexure I	TRUE COPY 23.07.2013	OF THE JUDGMENT IN AS 537/2000.	DATED
Annexure II	TRUE COPY IN C.C 227 COURT.	OF THE ORDER DATED 13. 61/2013 OF THE HON'BLE	01.2014 SUPREME
Annexure III	TRUE COPY NO. 1565/20	OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT 13 .	APPEAL
Annexure IV	TRUE COPY 30.09.2014 JUDGMENTS OFFICER, TH	OF THE COVERING LETTER SUBMITTED ALONG WIT BEFORE THE LAND ACQU ALASSERY.	DATED H THE ISITION
Annexure V	TRUE COPY SUBMITTED B	OF THE COVERING EFORE THE DISTRICT COLLE	LETTER CTOR.
Annexure VI	TRUE COPY	OF THE COMMUNICATION	DATED
	10.09.2014	ISSUED BY THE SECRET	ARY OF
	THALASSERY PETITIONERS	MUNICIPALITY TO .	THE
Annexure VII	TRUE COPY 18.10.2014 THALASSERY	OF THE COMMUNICATION ISSUED BY THE SEC MUNICIPALITY .	DATED RETARY,
Annexure VIII	TRUE COPY O	F THE REPLY DATED 29.10.	2014.
Annexure VIII a	TRUE COPY EVIDENCING MUNICIPALIT	OF THE POSTAL THE RECEIPT OF REPLY Y.	RECEIPT BY THE
Annexure IX	TRUE COPY 23.12.2014	OF THE COMMUNICATION .	DATED
Annexure 10	TRUE COPY 10.07.2019.	OF THE COMMUNICATION	DATED
Annexure XI	TRUE COPY 13.08.2019.	OF THE COMMUNICATION	DATED

K.P Fathima @ Pathootty v. Pradeep Kumar.R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.P Fathima @ Pathootty v. Pradeep Kumar.R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Vijayan Vs the District Collector

Ammini Emmanuel Vs Kodamthuruthu Grama Panchayath

Vijayan K.K. Vs National Highways Authority of India - NHAI

Kochukani Sarasamma Vs the District Collector

Veliyathukudyil Timbers Vs the Chief Forest Conservator

K.P. Fathima @ Pathootty, Vs Pradeep Kumar R.